The below post
discusses David Foster Wallace‘s grand commencement speech delivered in
2005. In this speech he explores the ideology of how education can coincide with
one’s ability to be more sympathetic, conscious and more adjusted to everyday
life. The speech is packed with life lessons and real life experiences from David
Foster Wallace himself. His humble and modest approach during the speech is
what caught the attention of the graduating class of college students at Kenyon
University.
He develops this
thesis that life after college is dreadful, because of the detailed analysis of
the average person’s routine that many of the graduates will soon be acquainted
with. However, throughout his speech it is evident to see that the main idea he
wants the students to grasp is that it all comes down to choice, and their
decision to either be cynical or make the best out of things.
This relates to
the allegory he creates at the beginning of his speech, about the three fish in
a fishbowl. Where an ‘older fish swimming the other way say “Morning, boys, how’s
the water?” and the two young fish say to each other “What the hell is water?”
This emblem of the speech could have many different interpretations (judging
from how one looks at things), but I interpreted as; the water symbolising
life, the two younger fish are just average people who have a very pessimistic
way of looking at life due to not being able to change their default settings
as a human, and actually understanding their surroundings. While the older fish
represents someone who has been educated and is able to alter his default
setting to be able to sympathise, be more conscious and better adjusted to everyday
life.
To make this more
relatable and actually put it in perspective for the students, David Foster
Wallace uses a bit of Logos in the allegory; where he made the ‘cynical’ type of
fish be two in numbers, while the ‘positive’ fish is only one. This portrays
that in life there are more people that are programmed to their default setting
than to a setting that is ideal (ie being sympathetic, empathetic and more conscious).
This speech accords
with our inquiry question ‘How
can literature develop empathy and emotional intelligence?’ Considering
how David Foster Wallace suggests that with education one is able to alter
their ‘default setting’, literature is just another piece of that puzzle. Since
we spend so much time in characters thoughts and we a direct link to their
emotions, it helps us with empathy towards people, actually sympathising with
others rather than being skeptical. In addition it aids people with the ability
to change their overview on life in total by being more conscious and more
aware of their surroundings. By understanding that although you might be having
a bad day there is always someone out there who’s going through worse. And it
is completely my choice to either look past that point and continue to have the
world circulate around me, or understand that and keep on reminding myself ‘This
is water, this is water’.
Apart from enlightenment, wisdom, a
boost to imagination, intellectual fulfillment and understanding of cultural
diversity through creativity, there is also the mere and simple fact that this
is the basis of the world we live in. Any piece of literature is a
version of our society that we see every day. Such as: love, betrayal, dislike,
death etc. It is real, and I believe that is the joy about reading literature.
Since it that real, we tend to experience the characters emotions and actually
understand how they feel at that moment. We can relate to literature since it’s
not that fake, as is popular fiction books. Since literature is based so much
and in depth about the characters involved, we start to be more aware of the
people around us, their body language, facial expression, etc. Thus making us
more socially and culturally conscious. It is important to study women’s
literature because for the longest time now it has been a minority group and in
the dark. Minority group means "singled out for unequal treatment."
So with that being said, the more dominant group, men, would be the majority
group because men have "greater power, privileges and social status."
We have had so many literature pieces from the male perspective that the women’s
perspective got shunned. We would get a better understanding of how our world
works if we all listened and accepted what everyone had to say, and voice their
own opinions through creative outlets, such as writing. The aspect of Alice
Munro’s work that I enjoy the most when reading is that she really tries
bringing every one of her characters to life. Not making them so far-fetched
that people snap out of their zone of reading, but somehow made it really
relatable at the same time. And for literature I’m glad that I noticed more
on the character than the actual plot because that’s what literature is, a
portrayal of our society and the people in it, at least, this is the case with Alice Munro's pieces of work.
·Michael
Jackson. A world renowned performer and will go down in the history books as
one of the best musical artists that ever lived. One of the most substantial
artists of the 20th century with works not comparable by others. Born
in a time of discrimination (regardless of the adversities he had to encounter
throughout his life), he still managed to make something of himself and
actually make a change in society, and how people see the world. With songs
like ‘Black or White’, which displayed an outlandish statement at the time
(because of all the discrimination towards skin colour) which was that ‘it
doesn’t matter if you’re black or white’, we’re all human. His main goal whilst
on his journey to ‘idol’ status was to make an impact on his audience, and
actually try and use his platform as a performer to better the world.
·The
narrator in this song is inevitably Michael Jackson considering he is talking
to and about the ‘Man in the Mirror’, so unescapably he is talking about making
a change within himself. And that he wants to make a difference, but not in a
way where he wants to change the world first, in the way where he wants to
change himself and then alter the way he wants the world to be, but as stated
in the song he has to start with himself. The very attention grabbing
convention of this song is that it was written in a way where the “narrator”
from the story can be anyone who finds themselves wanting to make a change in
their lives. Change isn't easy, so when I look in the mirror
and see my reflection looking back at me, that is who I have to start with
first. Every day we make differences in the lives of the people around us, and
it is our choice whether those differences better or worse their lives. And that’s
the essential gist of the song; that if you want to make change, start with
yourself first.
·In the first verse, the writer begins by
creating a winter setting by using visual imagery. The writer first wears his
“favourite winter coat”, turning “up the collar” as he leaves his home. The
writer then uses personification in “This wind is blowing my mind” – given the
wind a humanlike quality because of the word “blowing” and also serves as an
image to portray his state of mind by telling the audience that in the chilly
weather is not affecting him physically, but mentally because he is greeted by
the sight of “kids in the street, with not enough to eat”. This juxtaposition of
the writer’s wealth and the children’s poverty shows that they are from
different classes; while the writer has the luxury of choosing coats, the
children are not even able to get sufficient food. The writer then rhetorically
questions himself “who am I, to be blind?” Firstly, this is a metaphor and
hence an instance of figurative language as though the author might not be
physically blind, he compares himself to one that is blind. This shows that it
is probably not the first time the writer has seen the poor children outside on
the streets however; he has always been oblivious and too carried away by his
own personal life to “see their needs”. Hence, it is only on that day that that
he realized that he has been very selfish as he kept all his money for himself.
The
writer continues by using imagery in “A summer’s disregard, A broken bottle
top, And one man’s soul/ They follow each other on the wind ya’ know” to convey
his feelings to the audience. In the image of “A summer’s disregard”, as summer
is usually a time when people are carefree and on vacation, and disregard means
“to pay no attention to, to ignore” it might be the writer trying to portray
those times of loneliness and depression he suffered because of his problems.
The image of “A broken bottle top” hints that he may have had emotional issues
and therefore he resorts to drinking away his sorrows or venting out on items.
Besides, as a broken bottle top implies that there will be something leaking
out of the bottle as the top is spoilt, the writer could also be trying to say
that (given the theme of the song) he felt hope and happiness was leaking out,
not only from him but from the people who were suffering physically. Also, in
“they follow each other on the wind ya’know” – as the wind is very inconsistent
and moves around aimlessly, he tells the audience that he was a man who was
lost in his problems, but now he has found light and wants to start by changing
himself to help others.
Lastly,
in “a widow deeply scarred, someone’s broken heart, and a washed out dream,
they follow the pattern of the wind ya’ see” the writer once again uses imagery
to further highlight the plight of many of the people. “A widow deeply scarred”
brings to mind the image of physical scars, hurt and abuse, but we understand
that the writer is more so speaking about the emotional and mental hurt the
widow might be going through, the stress, the pain of perhaps losing her
husband, and hence financial stability. “Someone’s broken heart” – we know that
technically one’s heart cannot be broken, but the author uses this painful
image to bring across one’s anguish and despair – perhaps, given the theme of
the song, it could be referring to the broken heart of a mother when she sees
her children having not enough money to survive, or a broken heart of a child
not able to pursue his ambitions due to financial constraints. Lastly, in “a
washed out dream” – we think of many clothes being washed again and again till
they are faded, and likewise the writer uses this effective image to bring
across how an individual’s dream is faded. It evokes a sense of sympathy for
the poor people out there who are unable to live normally and healthily. Rather
they are swamped by such problems and it results in them being broken
individuals.
·Although the tone of the poem starts off
self-reflective, and also with a hint of despair and gloom, yet all the more it
inspires one to work towards being a better individual especially when we are
much better off and more privileged than most. It is peppered with imagery –
even “Man in the Mirror” is an image and a figurative language of speech to
indirectly refer or show us that the “man in the mirror” is not anyone else,
but ourselves