One of the reasons why the novel Things Fall Apart is a tragedy and can be related to so many other
tragic works is because the main character, Okonkwo, fits the classic example
of a tragic hero. A tragic hero is, by short definition, is a literary character who makes a judgment error
that inevitably leads to his/her own destruction.One of the major themes that
develops throughout the story because Okonkwo is a tragic hero is the theme of ‘Culture
vs Tradition’. This theme focuses on the clashing of the traditions that
Okonkwo wants to uphold by the Igbo people, with the culture and religion of
the colonists. Since Okonkwo goes against everything he considers to be weak
and feminine, he decides to retaliate against the ‘white man’ because he does
not want to seem girly. To some extent Okonkwo’s defiance of
cultural change is also appointed to his fear of losing societal position and
rank. Because his sense of self-respect is reliant upon the traditional criteria
by which society judges him. He develops this theme as a tragic hero because if
he were to adjust his ways and find compromise with the missionaries, it would not have led to his decision to commit suicide. I believe the reason Chinua Achebe
chose a tragic hero as a protagonist is because he wanted to impact his readers
by not making it the typical fairy tale ending, but where it ended with Okonkwo’s
death in the end. To show that colonizers really affected people, and to basically
give a voice to everyone that went through the same situation. Chinua Achebe
wanted people to feel for Okonkwo in the end, since throughout the entire novel
he was the focus for nearly the whole book. Therefore he wanted the reader to
get attached and then snap them out of reality by showing it did not end well,
and there really were no winners.
Monday, 27 April 2015
Saturday, 11 April 2015
Abraham Lincoln: Gettysburg Adress
In a speech that was comprised of only 10 sentences and 272 words,
Abraham Lincoln was able to shine light on something that would resonate not
only with his audience, but one that would echo through time. Why is this short
speech so notable?
First, it is vital to recall the context. America was in
the middle of a bloody civil war. Union troops had only four months earlier
defeated Confederate troops at the Battle of Gettysburg (which is widely
recognized as the turning point in the war). Thus, I believe the stated purpose
of Lincoln’s speech was to bestow a plot of land that would become Soldier’s
National Cemetery to honour the deceased. However, the Civil War still raged on
and Lincoln comprehended that he also had to encourage and inspire the people
to continue the fight. Therefore the speech is mainly a mix between motivating
people to keep fighting and also honouring the fallen. I believe that Lincoln
had one main audience which was the country in general, however he had a bigger
purpose with this speech. I believe he made it short and easy to follow so that
it could impact future generation, a speech to resonate in the ears and minds
of generations to come.
(In italics and bold are going to be the words of Abraham Lincoln
during the speech and under them are going to be my thoughts and views on the
speech itself.)
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this
continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition
that all men are created equal.
§ “Four score and seven” is much more
poetic, much more elegant, and noble than “Eighty-seven”. This is appropriate,
because 87 years prior, the United States had won its freedom from Britain and
thus embarked on the “Great Experiment”.
§ Lincoln reminisces to the audience about
the basis on which the country was founded: liberty and equality. This is a
perfect set up to the next sentence.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that
nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.
§ Here, Lincoln signals the task. The
values on which the nation was founded are under attack.
§ He encompasses the importance of the fight
beyond the borders of the United States. It is not just a question of whether
America could survive, but instead a question of whether any nation
established on the same principles could live. Thus does the war — and the
significance of winning it — take on an even greater importance.
We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to
dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here
gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and
proper that we should do this.
§ Lincoln turns to distinguish those who
have fallen for their country.
§ He uses contrast well. By stating “those
who here gave their lives that this nation might live”
Lincoln makes what is possibly the ultimate contrast: life vs death. This has
an immediate impact on the audience because the use of contrast is persuasive
in a speech because it directly proves the persons point, showing the good that
come out of their side.
§ He uses consonance — the repetition
of the same consonant in short sequence — through words with the letter
“f”: battlefield; field; final; for; fitting. This has an effect on the
audience because it makes the speech seem
more impressive and appealing and add certain amount of intensity and beauty to
them.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate, we can not
consecrate, we can not hallow this ground.
§ Notice the use of a “triple” sort of
repetition: “can not dedicate … can not consecrate … can not hallow”. Triples are a influential
public speaking technique that can add authority to your words and make them
notable.
§ Say the sentence out loud and hear the
powerful cadence and rhythm.
The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have
consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract.
§ This sentence is full of sincere respect
for those who fought. It is an expressive way of saying that their actions
speak much greater value than Lincoln’s words. This pulls on the
audiences pathos and really put the situation in perspective.
§ There is an alliteration as well: “poor
power”. The function of alliteration in speeches is to be both attention getting and memorable.
The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here,
but it can never forget what they did here.
§ There is a double contrast here, in this
sentence: “The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here” / “but it can never forget what they did here.”
§ Note the appeal to something greater. It
is not the United States that will never forget, but the whole world.
§ Ironically, Lincoln was wrong with this
statement. Not only have his words been remembered to this day, they will carry
on to continue to be remembered in the future. Which as stated before was
the reason I believe he made his speech this way, for it to be remembered later
on.
It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the
unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly
advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining
before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that
cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here
highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation,
under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the
people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
§ The final two sentences of the address
signal a call to action, a resolution to complete “the unfinished work”.
§ They are packed with inspiring words such
as “dedicated”, “nobly”, “great”, “honoured”, “devotion”, “highly resolve”,
“God”, “birth” and “freedom”. To inspire the audience to do the
great task he asks of them.
§ There are a couple of contrasts here: “the living”
with “the honoured dead”; and “these dead shall not have died in vain” with “this nation … shall have a new birth of freedom”.
§ Prior to this, Lincoln said that, in a
sense, they could not bestow the ground. Here, he tells the audience that to
which they must be dedicated: “the unfinished work” and “the great task
remaining before us”.
§ He finishes with a powerful triple
repetition (as mentioned before) that has become famous throughout the world:
“of the people, by the people, for the people”. This repetition displays authority
when being said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)