In The Thief and the
Dogs, it is difficult for the reader to formulate opinion about the unique
characters in the novel, due to the fact of how Mahfouz uses the stream of consciousness
technique; thus giving somewhat of a bias view on those said characters. With
that in mind, most of the characters that are portrayed through Said’s eyes are
viewed as negatively. Thus for most of the novel, making us view them in the
same way that Said does. For instance: Ilish and Nabawiyya are viewed in a
negative light by the audience, because the only insight they receive on these
characters are what Said believes, making it hard for the reader to create
their own judgements about the characters. Therefore in this case; those two
characters are viewed as negatively due to the fact they betrayed the
protagonist.
Although it was
mentioned that most of the characters in the play are viewed as badly, there
are a few that Said actually likes; Sana, Nur, and Sheikh Al Junaydi. Said
seeks guidance and comfort from the Sheikh, due to the fact that the Shiekh is his
late father’s spiritual advisor. However the part that ties in to why this
character is crucial for the advancement of the plot is that the Shiekh is a
Sufi Muslim. Suffism, a sect of Islam that combines more of a mystical approach
to God, from a point of view of peaceful reflection. Sufi principles contain
the main facet of dedication to worship of God, and have a disregard for
material possessions, rather make prevalent what is more important in life. That
being said you can see these kind of characteristics throughout the novel,
where the Shiekh is compassionate in his speaking whilst being heavily influenced
by God. This can be seen through Said’s first encounter with him after stepping
out of prison, “peace and God’s compassion be upon you,”, “You seek a roof, not
an answer,”. The reason this is important for the plot is because the Shiekh
was one of the closest characters that could have had an influence on the
outcome of the story. Considering that if Said found refuge in homage from
himself through the Sheikh’s guidance and wisdom, then the story might not have
ended in such tragic consequences.
Through the indirect
characterization of Said that was made by the Sheikh, the reader begins to question
whether Said has somewhat of a moral agenda or if he is actually just seeking
revenge. If Said did change his ways and found some sort of redemption for his
actions in the house of the Shiekh, after the accidental killing of the man
outside Illish’s old apartment, then the reader would have been able to
identify that there may be some good left in Said, rather than completely alter
their views based on his negatively driven actions. If Said had listened, and
not been so blind, to the people that were trying and willing to help him
through his struggles, then Said would not have had the downfall that he did
nearing the end of the play.